Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought it was interesting to read what other people said about the height adjustment of the V35 enlarger column and also about grain focusers, so I decided to do some testing of my own, after all, the height adjustment test should only take about a quarter of an hour. My masking frame is 20 mm thick so I have always had the enlarger head column raised 20 mm and it has worked fine. I have also tested this out with a commercial test negative, but this is 'dyed through' whilst the negative has the silver emulsion on the bottom side. I do not know if this makes any difference when fixing the correct focus. For the test I lowered the column adjustment to 16 mm and made a print, and the repeated the whole thing with column adjustments at 18mm, 20mm, 22mm, 24mm, and 26mm. I used f/5.6 and enlarged about ten times. (The negative was a Delta 100 developed in Xtol 1+1 and it is a portrait where you can count the number of individual eye lashes.) Practically no difference visible between the prints, not even when I compared the 16 and the 26 mm versions with the 20/22mm ones. So I did the test once more, this time at f/2.8 and 16x enlargement. If you look carefully, then the 20mm, 22mm, and 24 mm print are somewhat sharper than the other, but not radically. I asked a friend who is a professional photographer with several books published and also working for national magazines (Yes, he uses an M6 for some of this work.) and in advertising, if I should get a grain focuser. His reply was: 'Won't help you, your Delta 100/Xtol negatives have no grain.' So I am back to square one. Well, I think I'll adjust the column height to 22 mm, otherwise all the effort would have been wasted. Or I'll have to get a grain focuser and work more with HP5 in Rodinal (or is it Rodinol over there?).