Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Great minds must think alike. ;-) With the exception on only one point, this is EXACTLY as I see it. My only difference is that I have (and really like) the latest 50/1.4 Summilux. 24 ASPH 35/1.4 ASPH -best all around lens- 50/1.4 75/1.4 I think Leica "fast glass" has a very special look. The 24 ASPH is the best WA lens I have ever owned! Jim At 12:39 AM 2/23/00 -0500, Bill Rosauer (A.K.A. LEICAMAN56@aol.com) wrote: >I have several favorite M lenses. > >One favorite is the second formulation chrome 50/1.4 Summilux. One of the >best looking lenses ever, with its lovely scalloped focusing ring. Good heft >and great handling on a Leica M camera. Good performer optically, too. I'm >a sucker for any fast Leica 50mm lens, also owning 4 Xenons and about a dozen >Summarits (bought em when they were cheap). > >Another favorite is the 75 Summilux. Unique look to the photos, another >excellent performer, IMO better than the Noctilux, although a difficult lens >to master. Kind of chunky, but this is only a drawback when you're hauling >it around in your bag all day. Useful focal length for taking candid shots >in an average size room. Better suited for this than a 90. > >I also love the 24 ASPH. Fantastic performer, sharp all the way out to the >edges. One of my best shots, "Charleston Basket Ladies," was taken with this >lens. Great for travel. Much better lens than the Nikon 24/2. > >IMO the best M lens ever made is the 35/1.4 ASPH. Best all round lens in the >line. Has an incredible "look" that constantly gets comments from people who >look at my photos ask' "Wow, what lens did you use to take this picture !!?!" >Incredibly sharp even wide open. Only drawback is the size, weight and cost. > If I didn't need the speed, the Summicron ASPH would be my next choice. I >had both, but sold the Summicron as I felt it was redundant. Best lens to >have on the proverbial desert isle. But then, where would you get your >chromes processed? > >Bill Rosauer >