Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I read in the Hans Phalen's page that those who want to start in the Leica M sytem with little money, should start with lenses from the 60s. Because the new lenses sure are better in the lar- ger openings; but by f/4 and smaller, it is really taugh to tell the difference. Should this apply to the R system also? I ask because I'm in love with Leica lenses, but I can't affordd to buy a Lens every six months. But I found out that by using a Novoflex adapter to mount R lenses on an Eos camera, I don't have to worry about the one or two cam lenses; since they don't interfere with the body to couple with the aperture mechanism. So... in other words, my question is: Are 60s and 70s one and two cam lenses worth getting into? I already bought the adapter, but at the moment my Eos got stolen so I have to wait 'til I get another one. I know that a lot of you would oppose mounting an R lens on any- thing but a Leica. But my R-E got stolen also, and I wasn't alto- gether in love with the weight of my Leica camera (and that's without the motor winder), while if I use a Rebel 2000; sure I have to use a separate meter, but I get the benefit of auto advan- ce in the film, and auto rewind, plus the built in flash which does not loose its ttl ability, even thoug the lens would be ma- nual. Thank you for all your input; pro or con. Manuel Escobar Mecamera@aol.com ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com