Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Dominique, I have looked at the published graphs again (asph and TE). You are right! Sorry I accused you of misreading the graphs. The TriE at 40lp/mm has 72% on axis and the asph 68%. At 15mm we have for the TE 50 (t) and 60% (s), give or take a percentage point in either direction. The asph has at 15mm 85 (t) 60 %(s) So for the sagittal direction you have the same values. These are the most important. The values of the tangential lines have less impact on the results. So even if the numbers might suggest otherwise, the asph is not the clear winner. It is better than the TE at least in the outer zones, no doubt, but it is more of a slight difference than a big one. And we may add that the 15mm position is in the far-out corners of the negative. This position is a bit overvalued. I would look at the 9 to 12 mm zone for relevant info about the practical qualities of a lens. Erwin