Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: FS: 35 1.4 aspherical (1st ver)
From: "Timothy R. Kuntz" <covbldrs@usit.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 08:19:27 -0500

Jim, Bob, ALL others -
   I hope you have taken my comments about Eggleston, lens/lense, PC & speaking out, 'Is it art?', and should I/we add 'stupidity', with a LARGE grain of salt.
  Most all of the messages on this board are both tremendously informative (actual experiences), very professional, and by and large in good humor.  (I have to  laugh and cry as well at the short sighedness of the cruel and bitter flame-o-grams.)
  It has be fun sifting through the 100+ messages per day for information regarding the M6 & 35mm lens (I am looking for a used M6 and a 35 for it).
Thanks,
  Tim K 

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Brick" <jim@brick.org>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 11:28 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: FS: 35 1.4 aspherical (1st ver)


Fortunately for me, my prints are 20x24 Cibachrome prints. The film I use
is Fuji MS 100/1000 shot at ASA 200.

Jim


At 09:15 PM 2/19/00 -0500, Timothy R. Kuntz wrote:
>I don't know, Jim, for you to have admitted to using 'drugstore 4x6
prints' just might put you into the same league of Leica photographers as
this "Eggleston" guy we've been hearing about.  You used the term 'lenses'
- - was that the plural of lens or of lense - we need to know!  Thank you for
having the courage to speak out - whether or not it be PC or not.
>Tim K
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: <FIGLIO4CAP@aol.com>
>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 7:25 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: FS: 35 1.4 aspherical (1st ver)
>
>
>In a message dated 2/19/00 1:42:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, jim@brick.org 
>writes:
>
><< I may well be the
> finest lens I have ever owned/used. And I have, and have had, a lot of
> Leica and Zeiss lenses over the past 50 years. >>
>Me,too and I agree with you. I didn't want to last year, but even simple 
>drugstore 4X6 prinyts show the differences.
>Bob Figlio
>