Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, all. I pick up some of the sentences from a comparative review of Cosina lenses with Leica counterparts which appears in this month's issue of Asahi Camera. This is not a technical test but side-by-side comparison in real picture taking. Several portrait pictures (postcard size) are included in the original article but canot be reproduced here. :-( Here it goes... 1. Ultron 35/1.7 vs Summicron 35/2 asph Sharpness: Summicron is the winner by a slight margin. Bokeh: Ultron gives obviously smoother and more comfortable bokeh. Differences are visible in the shapes of the small branches and light between the leaves in the pictures. Contrast: Summicron is the winner, while Ultron renders smoother tonal rendition with softer realisation of light. When stopped down, the differences are no more visible. Contrast of Ultron increases significantly while Summicron does not change much (high from wide open). Colour: Summicron is slightly more yellowish. 2. Nokton 50/1.5 vs Summilux 50/1.4 Comparison is done with portraits taken with brillianlty lit fallen leaves in the back. Nokton retains a slight feel of bokeh with a "spiral pattern" characteristic of aspherical optics in ealier vintages. The sharpness in the center is extremely high even in this back-lit situation. Summilux gives halo at f1.4 and f2, giving an advantageous effect on this kind of portraits. Its bokeh is not very beautiful in the corners. 3. Colour Heliar 75/2.5 vs Summilux 75/1.4 Since Summilux is stopped down to f2.8, simple/direct comparison is impossible. Bokeh is comfortable in both lenses. Sharpness is also comparable with very fine rendition of details. Heliar gives better "nu-keh" (hard to translate into a Engligh word, penetrance or transparence?) in colour rendition, while Summilux is a bit more yellowish and reserved. Contrast, or the realisation of light, looks a bit higher or clearer with the Heliar, thus giving a modern feel. - -- The tester is a pro who is a Leicaphile. Those of you who own these lenses may want to confirm or further elaborate on the above evaluation. Please let us know what you agree to or disagree to. The same issue features a ten-page article on Bessa-R and its development history (interview with Cosina people and some prototype pics included). I am not a Cosina freak but find it intriguing! Do you know that all the optical componens of the Bessa-R rangefinder are made in their factories (Cosina is one of the three Japanese lens manufacturers that produce "glass" themselves.) Sorry, I have no more time to summarise it in English here. Cheers, Mikiro