Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]dominique pellissier wrote: > BTW the tri-elmar seems to me an odd thing : very expensive, cumbersome to > use, and a debatable optical quality at full aperture (f:4 only...). Dominique, I totally disagree with you about the optical quality. The Tri-Elmar is really, really good. My picts on 35 and 50 mm , even wide open, a really sharp. It's only on the 28 mm position that it's slightly soft on the corner. But better than my (1979-93) 28/2,8 at f/4. You know, I usually respect CI tests. But there are two tests result that I don't agree with: The Tri-Elmar and Apo 90/2 Asph. Lucien