Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 11:36 AM 2/15/00 -0700, you wrote: > Why not go to your local library and take out a few books on art >history and the history of photography, it is very interesting and helps one >to at least understand photographers like Eggleston if not appreciate them. > >John Collier John - I have a B.A. in Art, but it doesn't help me understand why photographs that I would have thrown away are displayed in galleries and sold for thousands of dollars. Perhaps the point is that he has thrown away the good (if there were any) and is displaying the bad as a statement? I respect anyone's right to admire these photos. I'm just saying from my point of view, if you have to explain a photograph or search for a hidden meaning, it has failed to communicate.] On the other hand, I have a B.A. in English also and I love Faulkner who often fails to communicate without an effort on the part of the reader. Maybe I just answered my own argument. I'm just worried that I may be throwing away thousands of dollars when I discard all of the overexposed, blurry, and scratched negatives without a second thought! :-) I can't save them all! How does the "art" photographer decide which bad ones to save? Maybe the problem with using Leicas is that there are too few bad ones for the galleries (back on topic). I hope you are right that in the future there will be no poverty and my photographs will be incomprehensible, but it won't be in our lifetime, I'm afraid :-( Leically, Tina Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com