Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob: Thanks for your informative reply to my questions about your 28 PC SA. You reminded me of one thing I disliked about my 35 PC Nikkor. I always felt that it was more suited to tripod use. But was that feeling real or imagined? I never really considered that it could be used as a "standard" lens. Back then I probably dismissed the idea, because nobody else used a PC lens as a standard lens. I'm older and wiser now. I'm trying more to think outside the box. I want to be creative. I want need to challenge all the stereotypes that I've carried with me regarding photography for years. For instance, if a PC lens can be used to "correct" converging lines, could it not also be used to "accentuate" converging lines? How might that be useful for creative effects? Further, a PC lens can be used for panoramics. Shift horizontally one way and shoot a frame. Rotate the lens 180 degrees (fully shifted horizontally the opposite way) and take a second frame. Now you've got panoramic coverage. I tried it with my 35 PC and it worked. (You can point your camera a little to the left or right using a traditional lens, but the effect is not the same). I never utilized the panoramic option. I never had the patience to match up the negs in the darkroom. But digital opens up a new world. I also think that a 28 PC would be much more useful than my 35 PC. Sorry if I'm thinking out loud. But a shift lens could open up some creative doors. Plus, on the practical side, it's also handy for architectural work. Now the question is, am I willing to pay to find out if it's really for me. David