Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dear LUGGERs, With the current thread of discussions on Kodachrome, what is your main reasons of using Kodachrome after all? Is it because it gives you the characteristics that the current E6 films(a lot of them) cannot match or you choose it for its archival ability? If it was the latter, how many percent of your shots that you intend to keep them around as long as the expected shelf live of the Kodachrome will allow(that is a long time)? I know that Kodachrome comes in ASA 25, 64, and 200. The ASA 25 and 64 films are possibly the popular slow speed Kodachrome films for sharpness and archivability. Personally, I like the results that current E6 films give me and I use them exclusively. I have not used that many Kodachrome films due to the inconvenience of the film processing compared to the E6 films. The archival ability of the Kodachrome is, however, very attractive. Regards, Pitak - -- Pitak Chenkosol, Dept. Electrical Eng.,| " I was born not knowing and have Portland State University, | only had a little time to change P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751. | that here and there." E-mail: pitakc@ee.pdx.edu | Richard P. Feynman