Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]11265. I didn't know that there were two versions. Ken Wilcox At 4:42 +0100 1/1/0, a fine scholar, Pascal wrote: >On 31-12-1999 19:53 Ken Wilcox wrote: > >>I must disagree with you on the 28-70 Vario. My wife and I share one and I >>have no complaints about its performance. The results are very good when >>compared to the 100 APO (a fabulous lens) The 80-200 f/4 Vario is even >>better, it outperforms my 200 Telyt including at f4. > >Glad to hear this Ken. But there are two versions of this lens, which one >are you referring to (11364 or 11265?) > >Pascal >NO ARCHIVE > >-------------------------------------------------------- >See my photo pages at http://members.xoom.com/cyberplace/ >-------------------------------------------------------- >An Apple a day keeps greedy Microsoft away ! >-------------------------------------------------------- ><<< PGP public key available on request >>> - ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com> <kwilcox@gfn.org>