Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Come on, Ted. Wouldn't it be fair to say that, if yoy're seeking exposure nirvana, a hand-held meter is always the tool to use. But if you want to get photographs in real life - i.e., of animate objects - just adjust for the red light and shoot? :-) B.D. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Ted Grant > Sent: Sunday, December 05, 1999 1:54 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] M6 meter > > > Mark Rutledge wrote: > > <<<<<The meter in the M6 is compelling, but the only info I > can find on the > metered area is that it is "selective". Is this somewhere > between spot and > centerweighted? If it is more spot, by the time you figured > what is 18% > gray in the scene, wouldn't it be just as quick to use a > handheld and get a > much less expensive M2,4-2,4P,? Any feedback is welcome.>>>> > > Hi Mark, > > This is how I generally use my M6's and without any thought > of whether it's > selective or not. > > I see, focus, adjust aperture or shutter speed dial, red > lights on.....SHOOT!:) > > If you stop to think where the area is that is being metered, > it's over and > you've missed the photograph. > > Keep it simple! I'm sure others will give you the technical > aspects, but I > can assure you using the in camera meter is much much faster > by far than > fiddling with a hand meter. Not that there aren't times when the hand > meter is the right tool. Rarely. > > ted > > Ted Grant > This is Our Work. The Legacy of Sir William Osler. > http://www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant > > >