Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"roland" <roland@dnai.com> wrote: >I just acquired a Jupiter 85mm f 2 and in my first tests stopped down for the outdoors have found it to be very sharp. It’s a Russian copy of one of the great pre-war Zeiss lenses - the 85mm Sonnar - so it has the potential of being very good. However the quality of individual examples is variable given the state of Soviet quality-control (superb for military products, poor for civil). At the Paris air show this year I used the Jupiter to photograph the radar in the nose of an Israeli fighter. This was outdoors with the lens stopped down. Taking a magnifier to the commercial 4 x 6 "sausage machine" print, I can read every word on the radar's serial number plate! On thing you need to keep in mind is that at f2 the depth of field is very shallow. To try the Jupiter out at ‘full-bore’, I took a photo of a presenter at a press conference. The quality of the result was acceptable but not great - than I realised that at a range of 10ft, her natural body movements probably exceeded the available depth of field. When I later tried the lens out more carefully the results were variable (the amount of camera shake I generate is often a limitation on image sharpness) but one image taken at f2 is every bit as sharp as I could ask. For a lens computed in the early 1930s, it's an impressive result. My rangefinder lenses are now a curious mixture of Russian, Japanese, and Leitz products. Since I couldn’t justify the cost of buying a complete range of lenses in both screw and bayonet fitting, I opted for screw mount. Unfortunately the Leitz decision to abandon screw-mount lens production around 1960 means that the designs available were in many cases either relatively slow, or very expensive because Leitz had made them in such small quantities that they had become prized collectors’ items. Regards, Doug Richardson