Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 11/20/99 8:05:44 AM, you wrote: > >And by understanding Adams, we have to view him as the ultimate >perfectionist, proud of his work but also confident in his knowledge of the >gear and emulsions available to him, willing to drive six hours into the >desert in a creaky car to shoot a picture at a certain time of day with >only a single sheet of film, as "I only needed a single exposure to get it >right". (My father commanded an anti-aircraft battery in Alaska during the >War. He knew an Aleut widow who would hunt caribou with a .22 rifle and a >single cartridge, as "that is all I need". She always came back with a >caribou draped over her shoulders, off to feed h oh please, don't repeat this old "good shooting indian"canard. anyone who goes off shooting with one bullet, and any photographer who goes off shooting with one sheet of film, would be a damn fool and a liar. I don't care who you are, you screw up on occassion. the cloud moves and you want a second shot. the cloud doesn't move but you time it wrong. Even Adams did it. He wasn't a machine, for crying out loud. but i agree -- who cares what camera he used/promoted. Hell, the man had to make a living. He probably didn't care what brand of tool he used that much. c trentelman ogden, utah