Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thomas: Regarding your questions about the R8 and R lenses as compared to Nikon: The glass is better. Your experience with yourM6 and 35 has probably shown you what Leica lenses can do. The R lenses are just as good. The R8 body is a matter of taste. I have one and love it; I have had no problems with it for three years (but I did have a metering problem with my first R8, replaced under Passport). Ted Grant, on this list, who is a professional photojournalist, also loves the R8 (I am not a professional photojournalist). If you use the reflex for macro work there is no better macro lens than the 100 APO Macro for the R. The 70-180 is also great. Yes, they are all expensive. If you can, borrow one, or rent one, and shoot a few rolls to see how you like it. If you have any more specific questions, I would be happy to try to answer them. I have been using Leica R for six years and have used the SL, R5, R6, R7 and R8, 19/2.8 (old style), 21/4, 24/2.8, 28/2.8 (old style), 35/2, 50/2 (old and new), 60/2.8, 80/1.4, 90/2, 90/2.8, 100/2.8 APO, 180/3.4 APO, 70-180 APO. I currently own an SL, R8, 35/2, 50/2 (old style), 100/2.8 APO and 180/3.4 APO. I switched from Nikon to see if the glass was better. It is. Regards, Jay Coleman