Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Several months back, we had a discussion about what attributes of an M contribute to a unique Leica (or at least, Leica rangefinder) look. Chandos suggested that the focussing system might contribute; Eric Welch and myself (I think) agreed that the ability to compose using the frame lines (so you could simultaneously see what was in and outside the shot and recompose accordingly) was more critical. I've had another thought which I thought I'd throw up, in the fine spirit of contributions well after the event. With a telephoto lens (by which I mean, more than 50mm), there is a compression of depth. With a wide angle lens (less than 35mm), there is a curvature of field. Both, of course, are apparent looking through an SLR viewfinder. Neither are apparent when looking through a rangefinder viewfinder - you are composing (I think, correct me if I'm wrong) essentially on a flat field. So for example, with a wide angle lens, you disregard the greater prominence of any close central subject and decreased prominence of any subject matter at the edge of the frame. With a telephoto, you disregard the compression of depth. Any thoughts? Cheers Gareth Jolly