Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob - As wonderful as the M3, M4, etc., are, I'd go for a "previously owned" M6 simply to have a body that was manufactured more recently and has therefore probably taken less battering over time. There are things I love about the M3, but I just figure that given how much money I have to put into any Leica equipment, why not go for the youngest body possible? And if you already have a camera with the .72 magnification, try to go for the M6HM to get the .85, which will be better with the 50, 75 and 90s. B. D. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of > Ruralmopics@aol.com > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 7:22 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Next body -- M3/M6-.85? > > > I've got one M body (a M-p) and two lenses (24mm & 35mm). I > expect to have a > 90mm soon. I'm starting to think down the road toward a > second body. I'm > thinking purely as a shooter, not a collector or even someone > in pursuit of > "the best." I almost insist on the M4-style loading system > and I like the > fact that the M4-2 and beyonds have a hot shoe (though I will > rarely if ever > use it). I might someday try the Abbramson winder so that's a > minor factor > (an M4-P and an M-6 use the same winder, correct?). > > I'm thinking I want something with a higher magnification > viewfinder for use > with the 90mm and maybe a 50mm or even 135mm someday. That > would seem to > limit my choice to the .85 magnification M6 but I'm wondering > . . . Is it > possible to convert an M3 to the modern take-up spool. I've > asked this before > and it seemed like the answer was a qualified "yes" but I'd > like a little > more specifics. Has anyone here done this? Who does this > (e-mail address?)? > What does it cost (IOW, would the modification + an M3 body > be significantly > less $ than a used .85 M6?)? > > Bob (dreaming of a 2nd Leica) McEowen >