Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My tuppence worth (English for 2c.) I'm feeling that Leica may be missing a trick in not renaming it's M cameras. Sure the M4 only became the M4-2 and later the M4P, but there is an external market to consider who may feel if there hasn't been a new number out for a while there hasn't been development of the previous model, which was inroduced over 15 years ago... But of course there has. The M6TTL became a re-ergonomised (?) camera along with a slightly different size, an M7 would have made life easier for the market, the engravers, the advertisers as well as giving the purchasers a greater sense of 'upgrade'. I'm not for change for the sake of it, far from it, but there are times when it has real benefits to consider... Jem > > I've always been against having an M7 out there. But this sentence (I > wasn't there) seems like someone died. I have this image of him saying this > in slow motion, reverberating around the room, everyone stunned with jaws > dropped - the whole thing about a minute long, then back to normal. > Still, however it sounds it's good. M6 will become something 'too' > dissimilar as time goes on. The ttl is enough. An M7 is fine just change > the first letter. It's not as if they've lined up and shot their research and development department. They've added TTL a nice touch, I'm sure other nice touches are in store. And there are other Leicas still to come. Why rethink perfection? I'm sorry I love the camera. I'm sure others will have added contexts as to the quote. Mark Rabiner