Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Mo' Bettah: The 35mm Summicron
From: "Stewart, Alistair" <AStewart@gigaweb.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 11:07:19 -0400

Dan,

How about 


Best value one lens outfit: Leica ii + summarit.

Better value one lens outfit: m2/4-2/4-p + 35 non-asph 'cron

Best performance one lens outfit: m6 + 35 asph 'lux. BUt I will argue that
99% of applications don't need this level of performance

one lens outfit, body choice controls cost: m2/4-X/6 + old 35/1.4 

two lens outfit, body choice controls cost: m2/4-X/6 + old 35/1.4 + 50 'cron

two body two lens outfit, body choice controls cost : m2/4/6 + old 35 lux,
and m3/6ttl + 50 'cron

Best value two body two lens oufit: m2/4-2/4-p + 35 non-asph 'cron and m3/ +
50 'cron, (or Leicaflex + old 50 'cron.)


and so on....


- -----Original Message-----
From: D Khong [mailto:dkhong@pacific.net.sg]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 1999 11:15 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Mo' Bettah: The 35mm Summicron



>>P.S. It is also my opinion--not shared by many on the LUG, I fear--that
>>the fewer lenses you have, the better. If you can get away with one, my
>>hat's off to you; if two, you're in good shape; three (perhaps by adding
>>a 21mm or 24mm to the above set ) and you're on the verge of lens-change
>>inertia and confusion


>Yes, I agree. I have three (15, 35 and 90) but if I carry all three with 
>the intent of using them, i get into rabid indecision all the time. I 
>work best carrying just one or two at a time. I would like a 21 as well, 
>but I'll wait until I think I really need it. 
>
>Godfrey
>

To me the choice is :
          ONE lens only  - 50 Summilux 
          TWO lenses outfit - 35 summicron and 90 elmarit/summicron

Yes, I agree with earlier posts that it takes time to master the use of the
50mm 'normal' lens.  I think those of us who are of the vintage which
started off photography with 50 lens on our first camera are more adept
with its use even till this day.  Then a few years later it was fashionable
to plonk a 35mm lens with a first purchase and that focal length became
'normal' until zooms got into the picture.  Now first time camera purchases
would be considered incomplete without at least a zoom as the primary lens.
 Nobody would now know exactly what focal length one is using when the
current shooting philosophy is, "frame it until you like what you see and
press the shutter."

I like street photography and the 35mm lens is more forgiving of focus
errors compared to the 50mm lens.  The downside with the 35mm is getting
slightly more clutter and junk in the pics which I overcome by cropping in
the darkroom.  

Dan K.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      
     Modernisation is not necessarily in the best interest of mankind.
============================================================================