Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The only complication I can see is that I would have to back up a bit more to get the wide angle perspective with the 50mm. Francesco Sanfilippo francesco@incsystems.com Webmaster & Network Administrator, InContact Systems, MentorU.Com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Paul > Chefurka > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 1999 12:33 PM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] using my M6HM > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Francesco Sanfilippo [mailto:fls@san.rr.com] > > > > I have been shooting exclusively with an M6HM and a 35/2 ASPH > > and I am finding too much fluff and garbage around the edges of > > my negatives. Feet, arms, halves of other bodies, halves > of trees, > > pieces of trash on the ground, you get the idea....... > > Might the problem be that either the extra eye motion > required by the HM > finder or the extra visual angle out to the edge of the > frame makes you less > likely to/able to examine the edges of the frame? If this > were happening, > you might get unconsciously lazy and not catch the extra > stuff going on out > there. > > Certainly a 50 will be easier in this regard as the frame > is smaller. But > going to a 50 changes your way of seeing and composing - is > this what you > really want? > > Paul Chefurka >