Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M4 versus M6
From: pelliss@isis.univ-nancy2.fr (Dominique PELLISSIER)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 16:17:52 +0200

Stephen Gandy wrote :

>I've lost count of how many factory trained techs, or former Wetzlar
>workers, or experienced Leica repair people that I have talked to about
>Leica M construction quality.  Every one that I have talked to regard
>regard M6 construction quality as a joke compared to the M3/M2/M4.
>Inside is a cheapening of parts and a change from a "adjust to tolerance"
>
>design to a "fit or replace" design philosophy.   Parts that were cast
>became stamped when possible.  Plastic was used where possible to lessen
>cost.     Perhaps you remember the problems a few years ago when Leica
>tried to cut too far with the M6 and used a plastic part  in the film
>counter.   

#################

I have in front of me the new leaflet "Leica M".
There are, p. 40-41, pictures of the inside of a M . I see no plastic part.
I see p.45 the shutter : no plastic part.

Question :where are the "plastic parts" ?

Dominique