Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> From: B. D. Colen [mailto:bdcolen@earthlink.net] > > I feel that because a camera like the F5 offers the > photographer so many technological options, the F5 is a > better value for the photographer who is going to avail > him or herself of those options. But isn't that a bit of a tautology, B. D.? You seem to be saying that a person places a higher value on those things he values more... So if I value quietness, relative compactness and simplicity of operation, then that makes the M a much better value to me than the F5. Of course I'm in the minority of consumers, because I'll actually pay more to get less - less noise, less size, less weight, fewer buttons and dials, less crud in the viewfinder, less stuff to think about when I should be watching my subject. To me that lack of stuff is what makes the M a better value. But, this is really only rebeating the dead horse of personal value systems, and I haven't seen him twitch in a while on this list :-) Paul Chefurka