Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] How to support Leica?
From: Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:47:54 -0500

B.D., I think you just said what Mark said.

- -----Original Message-----
From: B. D. Colen [mailto:bdcolen@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 10:18 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] How to support Leica?


 A Leica M cost the same as other top
> cameras, the Canon
> and Nikon.
> It just sticks is the craw of people to get a hand built low
> tech camera without
> the wiz bang of the High tech SLR's.
> But in all other ways it is a remarkable analogy. An ongoing
> dream for me.
> Mark Rabiner

Come on, Mark...I preface what follows by saying that I think the M is a
fabulous camera...but...In reality the M is MUCH more expensive than the F5
or the EOS. For the price of an EOS or F5 one gets a solid, dependable,
single-lens reflex camera that can be used as either an auto focus or a
manual focus, with shutter speeds to, what, an 8000th of a second, built-in
motor drives, an extremely wide array of excellent autofocus and manual
lenses, terrifically versatile and accurate metering systems, and about a
zillion accessories.

For roughly the same money Leica gives you an extremely well built,
dependable, rangefinder, manual focus camera with a cloth shutter with a top
speed of 1000th of a second, a flash sync speed of a 60th, a choice of
eight lens focal lengths and a couple of additional choices in lens speed...

Is the M a terrific camera? Yes. Am I willing to pay what Leica charges?
Obviously I am, as I now have two M6s. But am I getting the value for my
money that someone purchasing an F5 is getting? I don't think so. The M6 is
the much more expensive camera.

B. D.