Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 10/5/99 1:20:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, bernard.degaute@club.innet.be writes: << >Robert wrote : My vote goes to E200 Slide film. I use it and like it. I would however suggest that using faster films will give diappointing results because of their higher contrast and larger grain. You are probably better with a sturdy tripod and slower shutter speeds with either E200 at EI 200 or one of the 100 speed Ektachromes. Most stand fairly still and the camera shake is more of a problem than motion of the subject. > Xavier , I agree with this. Using 400 gives poor results and pushing 400 to 800 worst (too much grain , lack of saturation and so on). With best regards Bernard bernard.degaute@village.uunet.be >> I do a lot of wildlife shooting and also I've found that E200 is an excellent film as is the consumer counterpart Elite Chrome 200. I have pushed both 1 stop to EI 320 with good results although for some reason Kodak doesn't recommend it with the Elite. I have also used the Elite Chrome 400 and find that it isn't all that grainy nor is the color washed out, but of course there's a difference between it and slower film. If the reason for shooting high-speed film is to record wildlife in low light, then the extra contrast isn't usually a problem, in fact it's welcomed in that flat light. If OTOH, you're using high-speed film to stop action or because of a slow lens (such as the wonderfully sharp Leica 400 f6.8 Telyt) and are shooting in sunlit conditions, the contrast may be too much. DT