Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Visit from the US Leica rep
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 16:22:47 +0100

Hi Anthony!
I guess you may be right, but I think that at the bottom of this problem is
the fact that Leica production is lagging behind demand - be it overseas or
Germany.
All the best!
Raimo
Photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen

- ----------
> From: Anthony Atkielski <anthony@atkielski.com>
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Visit from the US Leica rep
> Date: 03. lokakuuta 1999 10:54
> 
> From: Marshall C. Hunt Jr <huntmc2@fuse.net>
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 1999 08:31
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Visit from the US Leica rep
> 
> 
> > Now what's wrong with this scenario? Does Leica USA
> > want to move products?
> 
> This is pretty typical of foreign subsidiaries of a multinational
company.  They
> are usually pretty clueless compared to the home office.  It doesn't
matter
> where the company is based or where the subsidiary is: in general, if you
are in
> a country that is not the home country of a multinational corporation,
you can
> expect extremely poor service compared to those fortunate enough to live
in the
> company's home country.  I've seen this over and over.  It is less
obvious with
> really large corporations that can afford to have very large subsidiaries
in
> major foreign markets, but even then it can be a problem.  For example,
> technical expertise on a company's products is usually nonexistent
outside the
> corporate headquarters, no matter how big a subsidiary is.  All
subsidiaries
> generally act only as storefronts (and thus emphasize marketing and
sales, with
> a little bit of customer service), unless they actually manufacture
product,
> which is rare.
> 
>   -- Anthony