Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> > And I'm afraid I must say that I find the majority of these photos > > tremendously unremarkable. > > Gasp! Heresy! Guards!!!! Arrest this man.... > > Well, now that someone else has said it, yeah - I don't think > HCB cuts it as > a portraitist. He's got some nice friendly relaxed pictures > of some very > famous people, but I didn't come away with a lot of new > insights into their > character. > > Paul Chefurka WOW! I certainly don't disagree, and while we're baring our souls...I'd like to suggest that Eisenstadt was and is greatly overrated. Yes, some of his images are iconic. But that doesn't mean they are automatically great photographs. Even he has acknowledged that the Times Square kiss is not a particularly remarkable photo. Most of his photos appear to be the result of his having gained access to the rich and famous, which is a credit to the power of Life, and also to what is pretty universally described as his own wonderful personality. But those photos of the rich and famous live on, I would contend, because of who they are of, not because, with some exceptions, they are in and of themselves great photographs. I know, I know, the photo of Goebels is truly remarkable. But that doesn't make Eisie a "great." But, hey, everybody who is vaguely interest in photography knows who he is..so...