Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bonjour, Last week I purchased (dirt cheap, in the Leica context) a used Trinol 105mm 3.5 lens. Much marks on the barrel, but with near mint uncoated glass. This past week-end I spent some time taking photos of my young son in the backyard and inside the house. All photographs were made on color (400) negative film with the beloved M5 and enlarged to regular 4" x 6" format. Now, this being Scottish glass you know it has to provide unique results...Well this lens lives up to this photographer s expectations...Being uncoated it is very much affected by stray sunlight (a shade was used) and loses contrast accordingly. However under more diffused light conditions, it performs nicely even at full aperture. Colors (different shades of green) are well rendered and fine details are visible. Performance is slightly better in the center than in the corners. This lens performance seems to be between the Komura 105mm and the Elmar 90mm in screw mount. The former (the only one I ever owned) had a ridiculous and unusable performance wide open (f2 I think) and was barely usable at other f stops, not to dwell on the fact that the front element easely came loose. The latter had more consistent and better performance at about all apertures than the Trinol. Overall that was an interesting very amateur test to perform. Actually, this lens, considering it s price, has a very good price/performance ratio. Anyone on the lug trying these unusual optics from time to time. This being my second post today I hope no lugger will bear a grudge for me flooding the bandwith. Regards, Robert (Un chevalier sans blason) P.S. This is one strange looking lens...two black paint rings, three chrome rings and one brass color body.