Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric, Just had a problem with the term "real" SLR. But then again, as you say maybe I should have read the post a bit closer. For me, I am an M'er but my SLR preference is not the R, not to say it is not a "real" SLR just not suited for my needs. Peter K > ---------- > From: Eric Welch[SMTP:ewelch@ponyexpress.net] > Reply To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 5:32 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; > 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] Nikon 300 2.8 vs Leica SLR lens > > At 12:50 PM 9/24/99 -0700, Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: > >Gee! Its so great to know that a real SLR is an R8. I guess I will have > to > >throw away my EOS SLRs and go back in time to when people relied on on MF > >and slow sync speeds. > >And the cult continues....... > > Peter, read a bit closer. We (Ted and I that is) did not say anything > negative about anyone's SLR. We were just defending the R8 from a dork who > > wouldn't know an F-stop from a door stop. > > Eric Welch > St. Joseph, MO > > http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch > > Learn from your parents' mistakes - use birth control! >