Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Robert, This is why I apologized to non-U.S. LUG members in my posting and offered to take any further discussion with interested parties off the LUG. Bryan - ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert G. Stevens <robsteve@hfx.andara.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 8:06 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Photo Vultures (didtoday,getalife) [no Leica] > Perhaps when we get these discussions on the Constitution of the United > States, the posters could remember that this in an International list and > some of the members are from Canada and the European countries where this > does not apply. Although the next time I am in the USA and I spill a hot > cup of coffee on my lap I may need the assistance of some of the litigators > on this list :-) > > Regards, > > Robert > > At 11:28 AM 9/25/99 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > >From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net> > >Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 05:26 > >Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Photo Vultures (didtoday,getalife) [no Leica] > > > > > >> Can I mention again that I for one and I'm sure others > >> find these discussions among lawyers and the legally well > >> informed to be crucial. > > > >I agree. A photographer can never be too well informed concerning the legal > >ramifications of his art or profession. > > > >There are times when I wish that the photographer's subjects would try to > inform > >themselves a bit better, too. > > > > -- Anthony > > > > >