Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Doug. It looks like I should start with something like PhotoCD and then go from there. That way I haven't sunk a lot of money into digital until I know I'll be happy with it. Bud - ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Herr <Telyt@compuserve.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 11:33 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Obtaining Color Prints > Bud Cook wrote: > >>> > Do you have any knowledge of how a quite good scanner attached to a PC > would > compare with having Kodak do the scan? > <<< > > Nope. It's not Kodak doing the scan, it's a custom lab using the Kodak > PhotoCD format (and maybe some Kodak proprietary equipment?). Caution: > don't confuse PhotoCD with the consumer-grade PictureCD that Kodak is now > promoting. > > I've had some scans I have not been satisfied with; most of these I > shouldn't have ordered a scan for anyway, for example no highlight detail > in the chrome, or various bird parts merging with the background. To date, > only 1 scan has been poor quality, and the lab re-scanned it at no charge. > > > I figured that the quaility of scanner used to make the PhotoCD was better > than I could afford, and it's their scanner depreciating at a horrendous > rate, not mine. The lab's depreciation is spread over thousands of scans, > while mine (if I were to buy one) would have to be covered by a few hundred > scans at most. Besides, not having a scanner means one less thing to keep > working, and less software to crash my system. > > Doug Herr > Sacramento > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/telyt >