Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My 18 year-old son is in his second year of a professional photography course, and has asked that we consider obtaining a Leica SLR with a 50mm for his use. He has access to a considerable amount of N***n equipment, so he isn't lacking for bodies or lenses to use. However, he has an aritist's appreciation for subtle, qualitative differences in tonal rendition, and has often pointed it out in photographs which (unknown to him) happened to have been taken by Leica-using photographers. I have read the archives, as well as some of the (very few) sites on Leica SLRs, and it would appear that our choice of affordable, used bodies include Leicaflex SL, R3, R4 (above ser #1.6M) and R4sP. There are a considerable number of two-cam lenses on the market at attractive prices that would make the Leicaflex a great value, but it lacks any AE (not necessarily a bad thing). Are conversions to three-cam expensive? How about the R3 from a users perspective? I'd like to keep the initial purchase under $600, if possible, for body and normal lens. Not to waste bandwidth, I must say it is a thrill to have my teenage son share an interest in photography. So, if buying a Leica SLR for his use promotes "quality time" interaction with him, it is money well spent! Your thoughts and suggestions are welcome. Feel free to email me privately if you wish, and if anyone has something along these lines to sell on Friday, please let me hear from you! Best regards -- Mike Crist camraluggr@aol.com