Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: was consistent underexposure problem
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:23:11 -0700

My R3's were stamped "Made in Portugal." Perfect cameras. Never a glitch.
Used them from 1976 to 1987. Eleven years of flawless performance. I think
they should stamp R8's "Made in Portugal."

Jim

At 08:12 PM 9/20/99 -0400, Dan Cardish wrote:
>I guess what I don't understand is how the value added by the final
>assembly of susbsets can be so high as to dominate all the assembly that
>took place in Portugal, thereby allowing the "Made in Germany" stamping on
>the camera.
>
>Dan C.
>
>At 07:28 PM 20-09-99 +0200, Dominique PELLISSIER wrote:
>[snip]
>>Comment : 
>>
>>As you know the cost of labor in Portugal is not as high as in Germany.Now
>>the process of fabrication includes much handwork.
>>Only the final assembly of subsets is made at Solms.
>>
>>Made in Germany, made in Canada, made in Portugal, made in Japan : it
>>doesn't matter.Made by (or for) Leica is important.
>>We are in a global economy.
>>(BTW my antique Apple powerbook 145 has been made by Sony, so what!)
>>
>
>NO ARCHIVE
>
>                       
>	
>