Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Wouldn't it be easier or at >least more visually understanding if "shallow depth of focus" were used? >Isn't that what it's really all about..the "depth of in and out of focus?" >What think you folks? The student is waiting, because I told him I'd >present his question to the worlds "great photo minds for an answer!" :) > >ted > I like the idea of using "depth of focus". It more clearly describes what you're trying to convey - the control of the area that is in focus. Seems like a good idea to me for you to coin this use of "depth of focus" as your own teaching tool. I think I'll use it too. I'm sure others will disagree. Henry Ambrose