Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Robert G. Stevens" wrote <edited>: > > I saw one of Galens slide shows in Calgary in July. I was not impressed > with the images, technically or asthetically. The consensus amongst the > attendees that saw the show was that they too were not impressed with the > quality of the images. Nikon should perhaps pay him to not use their > cameras :-) A lot of the images were not that sharp and others looked > manipulated digitally. The loss in image quality may be from this and > perhaps the viewing of dupes rather than originals. > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- Robert, Its kind of like the way I feel about Picasso, to me its crap! I prefer Caravaggio myself, but Picasso still sells and so does Galen's stuff. I like some of Galen's work. He does use digital printing to ensure large image quality so perhaps that is the loss you are seeing? I don't know. Either way, its subjective like anything else, hence the reason some like Ms and others Rs. Peter K