Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank: Rather than do another run of the R7, Leica should just introduce a new R8.2 with a few changes and then sell off the R8 as the second tier body. It would be energy more productively spent if they developed an R8 replacement. Regards, Robert At 04:18 PM 9/6/99 -0700, Frank Filippone wrote: >Leica's best shot at getting rid of this less than >desirable product will be to offer it with a 5-year >"exchange" warranty at no cost to the buyer. If the >buyer has a problem with the R8, he can send it in for >a new one...and the warranty would have to be >transferable. > >Interesting proposal.... a 5 year Transferable Passport, Worldwide valid? >Nice idea! And it won;t cost Leitz a cent.... as the cameras are, of >course, super reliable ( TIC .) > > >The problem with the R8 (other that it's history of >malfunctions) is that it is a BRICK. It is as big as >a Nikon F5, it is as heavy as an F5, but it only does >about 1/3 or of what an F5 is capable of doing. > >But the F5 will not accept the Leica glass..... the only reason to own a R8 >is because you want the Leitz glass..... > > >As I have said this before, Leica would be well >advised to make another production run of the R7s in >order to generate sales of both the R7 and R lenses. > > >Makes sense.... how much do you charge by the hour? > >Frank > >