Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Whether to buy a seperate meter?
From: "Dan Post" <dwpost@email.msn.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 12:43:50 -0400

Eric-
The method I was taught years ago- and it works particularly well with a
'spot' meter, but will work with any meter if you are willing to get close
enough to meter these relevant 'spots'-
If I meter for a deep shadow, say the tread of a tire under the shadow of
the fender, I'd take a reading on the tire, and stop down two stops. If I
meter on a highlight, not a specular highlight, light reflections off glass
or water, but say the front of a white shirt, with details like folds or
wrinkles, then I open up three stops from the reading off the shirt to get
my exposure. I use this mostly for color film as its range or latitude of
tones is somewhat limited, and depending on what I am shooting, if I don't
have an average scene, this works quite well.
Off course, if you have lots and lots of time, a leisurely measurement of
all possible areas in your scene is the answer, but this being an imperfect
world- as a PJ you know that by now- little shortcuts like that go a long
way to make things a bit easier!
Dan

> In those kinds of situations, I meter the bright white and make the
> exposure 2 - 2 1/2 stops overexposed for that white.
> Eric Welch
> St. Joseph, MO
>
> http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch