Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Been spending a lot of time in the darkroom lately. While purveying sheets and sheets of processed negatives I began to wonder what ratio of 'keepers' per sheet I had. Forgetting about exposure but concentrating on 'worthwhile' images (something that might look good printed & hung on a wall). It is an interesting, if not provocative undertaking. At the same time I was able to compare productivity in relation to camera types (P645, M6, M3, G2 & FTN). Which cameras gave me the best results (as it related to exposure & keepers)? From a standing position, negs in sheets spread out on a large light box, I could eliminate entire sheets for their 'spotty' results. I found myself gravitating to the medium format, but not just because I could see the image clearly from on high. (it's not such a big deal to lean over with the lupe.) Results? The P645 first, then M3 & M6 close seconds, G2, and bringing up the rear the FTN. [Hate to admit there were rolls in the batch from years ago, a hidden stash!] As for getting in close; the bastion of compact miniature format cameras, the P645 was just as successful as the M's & G2. Do I take more time (thoughtfully) getting shots with the M's -vs- other cameras? no. Do the M's take more time? yes. [I could perceive 'opportunity' frittering away as I stepped through the sequence required for a wholly manual process in opposition to the all in one views; the M3 was not as successful as the M6, for instance.] *Of course; test results may vary, opinions are completely subjective and do not reflect the political sensitivity of the author (ie; no troll). no archive