Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 9/2/99 10:08:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time, nathan.wajsman@euronet.be writes: << Subj: [Leica] Soft release question Date: 9/2/99 10:08:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: nathan.wajsman@euronet.be (Nathan Wajsman) Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us">leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca .us</A> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (LUG) Friends, I have a question which shows I am a true neurotic...Both my M3 and my M6s are fitted with Tom's soft releases. I am in the habit of always putting the cameras in the bag with the shutter uncocked to avoid battery drain and wasted frames. The question is, can the shutter release be damaged if the camera is in the bag and there is pressure on the soft release for long periods of time? Nathan >> Nathan, There is no problem with the shutter release being pressed down for extended periods of time. In case of the M3 it is strictly a mechanical function and the release does not care if it is up or down. In case of the M6, all that happens is that you hold the shutter-release down and as the camera is uncocked when you put it in the bag, there is no electronic switch wear either. Only problem that can occur is if you drop the camera with the shutter cocked and the release is pressed down sufficiently to turn on the meter, but not enough to release the shutter. The M6 then tries to take a reading of the interior of the bag and can drain the battery. I have found that this is less likely to happen with the Softrelease than without it. With the Softrelease it usually triggers the camera (because of the larger surface and slightly taller release), without the Softrelease you can have the release pushed down to the level of the surrounding cup, just enough to trigger the meter, but not deep enough to release the camera. All the best, Tom A