Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01BEF52C.5C3CB0C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does the SL2 have an disadvantage when compared with the SL for use with = long lenses? The SL is often mentioned favorably in this context. = Thanks. Julian - ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01BEF52C.5C3CB0C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Does the SL2 have an disadvantage when = compared=20 with the SL for use with long lenses? The SL is often mentioned = favorably=20 in this context. Thanks.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Julian</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01BEF52C.5C3CB0C0--