Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted- We've been around you long enough to know what you're thinking! No need to explain! I think Dan C hit the nail on the head! The photos I really like are those that use the 'background' to effectively frame the subject- though I have had a lot of experience putting telephone pole out the tops of the heads of LOTS of my subjects! Dan - ----- Original Message ----- From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@islandnet.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, August 30, 1999 6:34 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Seeing vs photography (was: BOKEH of 35mm lenses) > Dan Cardish wrote: > > >I care a lot about how the background looks. >>>>> > > Hi Dan > I guess I was a little cavalier in my comment of not "caring about the > background" which is really not the case at all. My comment was more about > "how it looks (bokeh) out of focus, I don't care what it looks like as > long as it's so far out, you can't tell anything from it but a blur. My > terminology for it? > A complete out of focus mush of colour or mush of greys in B&W with no > distracting highlghts or objects.. > > Like yourself, the background is important to me, simply because it can > destroy everything if it creates a distraction. > > <<<<<>Perhaps most photographers let the background take care of itself, > but for > >me it is an integral part of the image, in focus or otherwise.>>>>>>> > > That's a given and again, I was a tad careless in my original description,.... > <<<<"Like who cares about what the heck it looks like in the background? Isn't > it, "the subject in focus that matters most?" Surely the subject in focus > >is the most important part of any photograph?>>>>>> > > Obviously if we don't pay attention to the back ground we'll have trees > growing out of the heads! :) > > I trust this clarifies what I meant about back ground (bokeh) appearance. > > ted > > Ted Grant > This is Our Work. The Legacy of Sir William Osler. > http://www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant > >