Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gib Robinson wrote: > > As I recall, there is an ideal point to focus on in order to get the most > area in focus both in front and behind a subject. Can someone please tell me > what the rule of thumb is: -- something like "put the subject 1/3 into the > area of sharp focus." Is that it? For example, if the lens I'm using has a > DoF of 6 feet at 100 ft, would get the best results by focusing at 98 feet? > With short focal length lenses, I normally just put the subject at the > closest point that will be in sharp focus, but with a long lens that leaves > the immediate forground around the subject fuzzy. > > --Gib The first third in from the front: 37.3 ft. in that case. Just look at the dept. of field scales on your lens Gib! The one third rule is for when you don't have time to do that or with a view camera where there is not depth of field scale and you believe in the one third rule. And it doesn't work for all lenses. A famous rule that often doesn't work. I just puled out my 35 Summicron Asph m. With my 35mm lens to get 5 to 30 feet in focus at F 11 I'm focused at 8 feet. That's not one third, 13 feet would have been one third not 8. 8 is like one 4th or 5th in. But with many lenses it would work. You get more in focus behind what you are focused on then in front is a general enough concept. Mark Rabiner