Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Ted..I should have known..Actually though, I'll presume on your patience a moment longer...The Nocti is a bit too much for me...so if it's a matter of the two wides or a wide and the 75, I take it your feeling is that the 21 is basically unnecessary and the 24 more practical? If that's the case, are you one of those who holds that you can use the 24 by just using the full viewfinder, rather than the auxiliary? Thanks again... B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Henry Ambrose Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 2:27 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] THANKS! From Dr. Blacktape and B.D. >Suppose you already had a 35 1.4 and a 90 f.2...You could add either a 21 >ASPH and a 24ASPH....a 21 ASPH, or a 24ASPH, AND a 75 Summilux. You shoot >virutally all b&w...all available light...all people, much of it in tight >surroundings,....which would you chose and why? (I have used a 21 >extensively, love it, do get enormous use out of it, but find it a bit >extreme at times. I have owned a Nikon 24 and used it extensively, but found >at time it wasn't quite wide enough...Which means, do I go for the two >wides, and say to hell with the 75? Or do I add that fabulous 75 with it's >extra stop, and settle on one super wide?...Help Me Before The Insurance >Check Comes! > >B. D. > 24 and Noctilux (this wasn't one of your choices but what the heck :) Heal quickly and well Henry