Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- --=PMail:=_0003@@0BBu3u7jlbqh8vYg5xTO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marc, How does the latest version of the M90f2.8 compare to these earlier version= s? Arturo =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> To: Internet Mail::[leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] Subject: Re: [Leica] 90 Tele-Elmarit Date: 8/26/99 10:44 AM At 09:16 AM 8/26/1999 -0400, Sam Alexander wrote: >My first version of the (thin) 90 2.8 tele, bought new in the mid 60's, The fat Tele-Elmarit was produced from 1964 to 1974, the skinny Tele-Elmarit from 1974 to 1989. Hence, you could not have purchased a skinny Tele-Elmarit in the 1960's. However, if you mean the fat Tele-Elmarit, it is generally conceded to be optically superior to the later, and much smaller, skinny version of the lens. Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! - --=PMail:=_0003@@0BBu3u7jlbqh8vYg5xTO--