Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The Ernst Leitz Canada facility was built in 1953 and part of the reasoning was to have a modern facility designed to cater to the North-American market. It was a scant 8 years after the end of World War II and also the beginning of the Cold War. From a point of view of producing photographic equipment for the burgeoning US market it made sense and the possibility of tapping in to the lucrative military market in US probably played a part. Over the years I have heard several reasons why the Canadian site was chosen over a US site. One was the requirement for moving highly skilled German technicians to the new plant and the US government showed remarkable resistance in allowing the "former enemy" to settle in USA. Be as it may be, we could have had a truly Made In USA Leica if this had not happened (ELUSA instead of ELCAN!). The choice of Midland was made because of its proximity to Toronto and its location on a fairly stable part of the Canadian Shield, an area not too prone to earthquakes. This makes sense if you do very sensitive Optical Bench testing. The other reason was evidently a fairly selfish one, the Leica importer in Canada at the time was Carveth Inc. and Mr. Carveth had a fishing cottage at the lake in Midland and having the facility there would allow him ample opportunity to go to Midland for high level consultations and fishing, and the whole thing would have been a tax-deductible expense. It appears that Mr. Carveth lobbied the factory in Germany for the establishment of an optical plant in North America early on and he could very well have helped in acquiring the site too. This information is very much hearsay and should be taken as such. However I doubt that the Canadian Military was involved in the project, but I am sure that the US Navy and Air Force was pushing for it. The production of cameras and optics started almost instantly. Today you can find 3F's and 3G's with Ernst Leitz Midland, Canada engraving (if you are willing to pay the high prices they demand) and very early on the production of the M-camera was split between Germany and Canada. In most cases there were no engravings that differentiated the cameras, only in the serial number listing would it appear as an ELC suffix. Midland's greatest achievement was its optical design team. The lenses produced and designed are among the best optics built. Dr Mandler, who still lives in Midland, created optics like the 50/1 Noctilux, the 75/1,4 Summilux, the 35/1,4 (early version - and in 1959 this was a remarkable lens), 21/2,8, the 90/2 early version and the subsequent ones, all the way up to the current 90/2 APO-Asph. For a long time the only M-lens made in Wetzlar was the 50/1,4 (the 21/3,4 was a Schneider design). If this is not remarkable enough add, the 180/3,4 Apo, the 100/2,8 Apo-Macro for the R-system and a large body of custom lenses for the US Military, lenses like the f1/90, the 28'/f4, the strange 12" set up with four matched lenses, covering a 10"x10" plate (each lens covering a 5"x5" part of the neg., one lens is an APO-lens, one is UV-sensitive, one has a resaue plate in it for doing measurements from the neg. and the fourth one is a reference lens. There is also a strange ELCAN lens, 12 or 15' focal length with one lens element deep red for Infrared photography as well as all of the strange stuff made for the military M-cameras, 66mm/f2, 75/2,4 APO, 50/2 ELCAN etc. A lot of the optics we are using on our Leicas has originated in that little town, a couple of hours from Toronto. In a lot of cases, the "Made in Germany" labels were stuck on lens assemblies shipped from Midland. It should also be noted that the M-camera of today, owes most of its existence to Midland. The President of Leica Canada, Walther Gluck saw an opportunity and managed to convince Wetzlar that the failing M5 should be replaced with a remade M4 and got the M4-2 on the road. We should probably give thanks to his foresight and, although the M6 TTL is not loved by us all, it could have been worse, it could have been a M5 TTL! It is my understanding that Leica Solms has severed the connections with the Midlands facility, the last pieces that came out of there were the optical system for the first 90/2 APO-Asph and some of the elements for the Noctilux. Unfortunately I suspect there is very little interest at Midland to provide us with any information regarding what they did. Any time I have tried to ask they just say "its classified" - great way of not having to answer questions. Leica Midland is also well known for its manufacturing of high quality binoculars, sold under the name ELCAN. As for which is better, Canadian or German, I never seen much of a difference. My biggest problem was 4-5 years ago, when some of the more common lenses were assembled in Germany and I found the focussing mounts very stiff compared to the Canadian made ones. It would be very interesting to find out more about the Midland Years, there are probably reams of information available, but at the moment they are not allowing any of it to be published. Pity! Tom A Tom Abrahamsson Vancouver, BC CANADA www.rapidwinder.com