Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Monaghan's thought on AF lenses
From: InfinityDT@aol.com
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 18:48:59 EDT

Two issues surround AF focusing.  One is the AF detection accuracy and the 
other is the focusability of the lens itself.  The long, fast AF lenses (AF-S 
Nikkors and Canon-L USM's) focus with deadly accuracy both in AF and manual, 
and they have almost zero DOF.   I've found with my shorter non-AF-S Nikon AF 
lenses the focus is extremely accurate when using the AF, but more difficult 
to hit when focusing manually.  The super-light touch and short-throw of the 
lens' focusing rings are impediments to critical focusing for me.  The one 
thing I liked about the Leica R lenses in my brief encounter with them, is 
that the pitch of the helicoids is more fine-tunable, which makes critical 
focusing much better.  The trade-off is focusing speed, though.  I found the 
Leica R lenses stiffer and needing more ring-turning than I'm used to even 
with Nikon manual-focus lenses.   Inasmuch as I only use a 35mm SLR for 
wildlife or macro (and carry a couple shorter lenses just in case a photo op 
pops up) I've stayed with the AF-S and couldn't be happier.  For the shorter 
lenses and 99.9% of my travel and general photography I still haven't found 
any focusing method swifter or more positive than the M rangefinder.