Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ben: Weree your comments regarding the train pictures? If they were, both the train pictures were done with an 189 APO Summicron, shot wide open at F2. Regards, Robert At 11:57 AM 8/21/99 +0800, you wrote: >Hi Robert, > >First I must admit, I am guessing here. Is the left one by leica? (It's >seems more stands out and crispy.) > >Very curious. > > > >Regards >Ben :) > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Robert G. >> Stevens >> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 12:22 AM >> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> Subject: [Leica] Leica 280 2.8 versus Canon 300 2.8, a challenge >> >> >> >> >> I have posted a web page with two soccer pictures, one taken with a Canon >> 300 2.8 EOS and EOS 1n with the other taken with a Leica 280 2.8 and R8. >> Why don't we do a survey and see if people can tell which is the Leica >> shot. Both were done on the same film (RSX 100 II) and in the evening. >> One is on grass, the other on artificial turf and no direct sun. If you >> click on the images, they will bring up a larger image. Pay attention to >> detail in the black shorts. Is the Leica picture the one on the left or >> the right? >> >> http://home.istar.ca/~robsteve/photography/Misc.htm >> >> The train pictures on the top of the page were both taken with the 180 APO >> Summicron on the older and less sharp RSX 100 film. >> >> Regards, >> >> Robert >> > >