Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 12:32:32 +0200 >From: Mikiro <arbos@silva.net> >Subject: Re: [Leica] Comments on 80/1.4R... > >Hi Jiri > >I now own a 75/1.4M, an 80/1.4R, a 90/2R, and I once owned a 90/2.8R (latest). > >Based on my limited experience I can say: > >The former three lenses are all excellent in terms of sharpness, >flare-control, and bokeh. But I did not like the bokeh of the 90/2.8R. > >A 75 and an 80 have similar fingerprints. They are both "Riesling grand cru" >from different vineyards. An 80 gives a bit more massive images (to my >eyes) at middle apertures while it is softer at wide open. However, as you >know, I get a lot of soft images (out-of-focus!) with a 75/1.4 wide open. >;-) > >The 90/2R gives a very comfortable images particularly in portraits. I feel >its character different from those of the 80 and 75. It is "Pinot blanc". >I would not accuse a person who likes a 90/2R better than the other two. > >BTW, I have a 80/1.4R and a 90/2R in mint- conditions for sale. Please >refer to my Friday Sale post. I have decided to downsize my modern R system >and to live with Leicaflexes. :-) > >Mikiro >Strasbourg France > ################ Bonjour Miriko, I agree with you on the "bad" bokey of the Elmarit R-90, 2nd type. 19 years ago, my first Leica lens was the 1st type, bought used.For me, that lens was my favourite. I stupidly sold it for a Summicron R- 2/90 : bad bokey as the bad bouquet of a bad Riesling wine.I sold the Summmicron some weeks after buying it... I bought, used, the Elmarit, 2nd type, and sold it 3 days after (with extra income): "bad bokey" and the shade is too short. Now I have again the first type, bought as new for peanuts.The bokey is as good as a "Vendanges tardives" Gewürtztraminer. As a lens taster, Mr Puts, could you one day compare the 2 types of Elmarit-r lenses ? In vino veritas. Dominique Pellissier