Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 20:32 -0400 15/08/99, Dan Post wrote: . . . > Leica's forte, it seems, is in the excellent optics, >and a fine tradition of mechanics. IF this could be coupled with the >electronic and design expertise of another firm, even Minolta, it might >prove interesting. ... --> I'm under the impression the Japanese manufacturers are keeping very close control of the autofocus and related patents as they are sources of a lot of jobs in Japan. I could be way off but that seems to fit the situation and general pattern. I sure wish I'd find an article that documents the Contax 645 autofocus with regard to the patents involved. --> If and when Leica comes out with a next generation SLR, you can be sure I'll try my best to understand how they went about to circumvent Japanese autofocus patents. Like Nikon AFS (microwave cavity resonance collimator), Leica's way to get into autofocus is either going to have something to do with existing patents or be some pretty wild "third degree" technology because, it seems, the wise Japanese ( not cynical here) have pretty much cornered the potential patents and reverse engineering pathways to an autofocus system. I just can't wait to see what Leica's AutoFocus system is going to be related to, technology wise. --> I'm also impressed with the advanced metering technologies of some autofocus SLR units. Color dependent metering, multi-sensor strategies, predictive autofocus, 3D light sensing technologies are more than just gizmos, if I understand anything or how they work "in there". The intellectual and organizational effort to generate such cameras must cost freak out amounts of monies only powerful conglomerates can entertain. There's national pride, somewhere, too. --> One question has to be: is the high performance SLR world-market saturated and going into a replacement market mode ? How many years from now will the world market be able to support a C$5K camera and make such a worthy business pursuit ? Difficult questions, "up there". --> though we are discussing film based cameras, it's wise to consider what the digital markets hold, in their shadow, and how much is enough to get enoough people to BUY these, and at what price. This may be part of Leica's problem. The solution will be interesting. Andre Jean Quintal