Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: R: [Leica] Lieca & Minolta - A perfect marriage
From: "linda" <lindaboz@tin.it>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:16:13 +0200

A perfect analysis.Bravo!
Giancarlo
- -----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Bernard <5521.g23@g23.relcom.ru>
A: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Data: marted́ 17 agosto 1999 16.09
Oggetto: Re: [Leica] Lieca & Minolta - A perfect marriage


>Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote:
>
>> LUGites,
>>
>> I think Minolta would help Leica especially from a financial
>> perspective.
>> Since Leica really has a very small piece of the SLR market, imagine a
>>
>> Minolta/Leica R9 with AF lenses made by Leica.  WOW!
>>
>> (BTW, AF technology was originated by Honeywell, Minolta was just the
>> first
>> to put it in an SLR and Konica the first in a point & shoot)
>>
>> You'd finally have some real competition for Nikon and Canon!  Minolta
>> is
>> probably the best ergonomically engineered camera on the market.
>> Always
>> very easy to use. The Leica name has great value in the photography
>> market,
>> so combining this advantage and a state-of-the-art (albeit not a
>> collectible
>> piece just yet) Minolta made R9, would really help both companies form
>> a
>> financial perspective.  Minolta may help getting things out to market
>> in a
>> timely fashion, perhaps even build in a motor drive so one doesn't
>> have to
>> wait a great length of time in the hope they finally become available.
>>
>> The only caveat is that they both are poor in the marketing
>> department, but
>> this is easy to remedy.
>
>The result may be great, technically, but many technically great product
>have failed on the market. Marketing is the problem I see with this
>Leica-Minolta team. Leica SLRs are still being accused of being
>overpriced Minoltas. And let's be fair; Minolta is the last of the
>Japanese Big Three. Minolta is not a "pro's choice" in the people's
>mind, and when you look at the statistics, it's not only in the people's
>minds. Compared to brands like Leica, Hasselblad, Linhof, Sinar et al,
>Minolta is a "cheapo-brand".
>
>This is not to say anything against Minolta, but they are positioned in
>a totally different market segment than Leica.
>
>B
>
>
>