Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Don. As I stated in my earlier message, although I said I liked my M4 better, I hope Guidosoprano also noticed I said I did own an M6 as well. I am only too happy to buy one at the price Leica offers it for. If they made the M6 at the same level of finish and feel of the M4 or M3 of 30 years ago, I could not afford anything approaching $5000-$9,000 for one, as I would suppose many others on this list could not. The M6 is still, in my opinion, better built than MOST of what's available today. Greg - -----Original Message----- From: DonjR43198 [mailto:DonjR43198@aol.com] Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 8:56 AM To: leica-users Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Old Leicas and better than the new "Junk" Cameras In a message dated 08/13/1999 12:15:49 AM Central Daylight Time, guidosoprano@hotmail.com writes: << tatistical samples of one? "even looked cheap" you might be funding the Krauter "anything made after the 50's is krap" manifesto, but it ain't so get a life GS >> The appearance of the M-6's are not limited to a "statistical sample of one" since the standard M-6's have the same "unfinished" appearance. As far as the craftsmanship the following from the "Leica M Guide" the author states: "Bucking this trend is the worthwhile but very expensive M6J. It's a M6 made to the higher standards of the M3, with a beautiful chrome finish and engraved top. Besides its $9,000.00 price tag, perhaps its most noteworthy feature is its finder. " It is not just Mrs. Krauter who has noticed the difference between current manufacture and the earlier workmanship that went into the M-3's and M-4's. Thanks for the opportunity to respond.